Gay Marriage Rant

Recently the citizens of California voted to recognize mariage as a legal bond between one man and one women. Then a few judges overturned what citizen voters decided, causing gay marriage to be legalized in California. The judges' reasoning was that each individual in a gay marriage is a consenting adult, giving them the right to marry. What additional "rights" are they obtaining from marriage that they can't obtain through a legal domestic partnership? The reality is that gay individuals will not receive any additional rights. Infact, domestic partners can already share health insurance, buy a house together,or even adopt a child. So then, why are they fighting so hard for the "right to marry"? They are interested in the title. For thousands of years, marriage has been a title placed upon the most sacred and highest commitment between a man and a women, by religous denominations. Now, they want to steal that title for themselves as if doing so would make their actions seem more normal. The worst part about all this is that a once sacred religious title has been given to gay partners, by powerful liberal judges, with no religious authority.

Another large problem is what this might lead to. Soon judges might reason that if gay concenting adults legally marry, then why can't one man marry several women, or one women marry many men. They might say that in polygamy those involved also consenting adults. Now lets take it one step further. What if someone wanted to marry an animal or even an object like a pencil or pen because they claimed that they were in love? The judges might then give the sacred title of marriage to those sickos! This sacreligious ruling made, by liberal California judges, could very well destroy the institution of marriage as we know it.